Mainstream Media Bias Alert, Polar Bear Edition

Don't hurt yourself when you spin like that.

In October, the NY Times published an editorial blasting the Bush administration for proposing a regulatory change that would “free the government from considering the effects of greenhouse gas emissions on polar bears and other imperiled wildlife. “

Barely (bearly?) six months later, the NY Times published an editorial agreeing with the Obama administration for upholding a regulatory change from the previous administration that would…well, you get the picture, it’s the exact same regulatory change.

Clearly, the Times make up their collective minds whether an action is bad or good based solely on who performed the action, not on the action itself.

Surprised?