Too stupid to even wrap fish in it

Most of the time, the NY Times is not fit to read. This recent opinion piece, however, stands out in its stupidity. The editorial is about the Justice Department not bringing charges against Tom DeLay

Sample this from the piece.

"But many of Mr. DeLay’s actions remain legal only because lawmakers have chosen not to criminalize them."

You got that? The only reason DeLay got off without being prosecuted was a tiny technicality, according to the NY Times, that the "offenses" weren't actually against the law.

I guess the Times figured that should never stop a Republican from being charged.

I wonder how they feel about Charlie Rangel, Maxine Waters, and the rest of the criminal rabble on the other side of the aisle?