Oops my bad, homeless edition

Homelessness rose 50% during in one year during the Bush administration, and the headlines lasted for weeks. Pit bull journalists dug relentlessly for reasons why the administration would be so uncaring as to allow such a dramatic rise in the numbers of homeless. Calls for accountability were rampant as the media sought to find those responsible for the crisis.

Oops, my bad.

The rise occurred over the past year, while some guy who attended muslim school as a child has resided in the White House, and the silence from his lapdogs in the lamestream media has been deafening.

It's been over two weeks since Fox reported this. Have you heard a peep from any of the goobers at NBC, MSNBC, CNN, CBS, ABC, or any of the other pseudonetworks? Didn't think so.

Move along, there's nothing to see here.

Will the press sing "I Hate Myself For Loving You" or "I Will Survive"?

Chris Stirewalt writes an article in the Washington Examiner on the breakup of the love affair between the media and Obama.

This could get ugly.

I wonder if Chris Matthew's leg will stop tingling?

On what does she blame the lefties who pay thugs to be bussed in and attack normal people?

Media lapdog Katie Couric blames “fear” and “ignorance” for the town hall protests by normal Americans who are simply concerned for their liberties.

Who's a good widdle lappie dog? You are, perky Katie, yes you are.

I am Kenneth Gladney

Andrew Breitbart writes a chilling take on the media lapdogs who hear Their Master’s Voice.

The violence from the left continues and the media is blind

More violence at a town hall meeting. Again, it’s lefties who attack a normal American who is simply concerned with the loss of his liberties.

Why is Youtube becoming the only way to view these videos? Why are the networks not on this story? Why do the media lapdogs content to curl their tingle-laden legs under their glassy-staring eyes and bask in the radiance of their master?

As the man who was attacked by an Obama supporter (according to reports, a black female) is leaving, you can hear other leftie thugs taunt him by laughing and asking if he has health insurance.

Classy all the way.

Why do average Americans need to educate "journalists" about current events?

Turns out Lawrence O’Donnell isn’t as smart or up on current events as he might think.

He repeatedly scolded an average American on national TV because she said Obama said he was in favor of a single payer system. O’Donnell said multiple times that never happened.

Of course, anyone with an IQ over 50 knows Obama actually did say it. More than once, in fact.

Who’s a good media lapdog? You are, Larry. Yes, you are.

Who's a good media lapdog?

Here’s a list of three big stories the obama media lapdogs avoided like the plague.

Watching the media fawn over Obama reminds me of the old RCA advertising with the dog Nipper intently listening and watching the gramophone, titled His Master's Voice.

I guess it's like the circle of life that GE bought out RCA, and GE owns NBC (Nipper Broadcasting Company?) and MSNBC, who are mesmerized by the sound of their master's voice (not to mention the tingling in the legs).

He's the one man who would never listen to Rush

Every media lapdog is dutifully reportng the Obama with the Hitler mustache poster as being the result of Rush Limbaugh and his right wing minions.

Gee, wouldn’t it be neat if they actually read the poster? It says “I’ve Changed.” Underneath that it says “LaRouchePAC.com” which is the website for Lyndon LaRouche, the Communist who has run for the DEMOCRATIC presidential nomination seven times.

Great job of investigative reporting there, guys.

Media lapdogs still lapping it up

Paul Krugman is a perfect example of the leftie elitist media lapdog wanting nothing more than to snooze peacefully on the President’s lap, bathed in sunlight.

His article makes a complete mockery of any pretense of journalism as he lies and calls people who are involved in the democratic process everything from racist to birthers to riot mob.

President Bush made a very reasoned, very logical plan in 2005. Social Security is going down the tubes. Everyone knows it. Everyone admits it. Bush wanted to give people the option to take some of their social security money that the government was holding for them and decide where to put it, like you do with a 401K. Leftie protesters came out of the woodwork frothing over any attempt to deprive government of any power. Of course they were spurned on by lefties who just absolutely love centralized power.

Krugman makes the outrageous claim in his article that the 2005 protests were nowhere near as raucous, noisy, or disruptive as the ones at town halls now. Perhaps if Krugman had bothered actually doing any research as he claimed he did, he would have found the proof he claims does not exist.

Here, Jon Henke proves Krugman is lying.

Here, the Politifact.com truth-o-meter goes thumbs down on Krugman with more proof.

Here is an account of 9 people being arrested for disorderly conduct for shouting at an appearance by President Bush.

Here is an ironic account of protesters shouting at Dianne Feinstein, because they thought she might not vote against Bush.

Gee, do we have to go on any further? This took all of fifteen minutes to confirm what has been revealed time and time again - that Krugman is either a liberal mouthpiece willing to lie to make his (Democrat talking) point, or he is totally incompetent.

It’s almost funny to read Krugman trying to call average people a bunch of astroturf fake protesters, paid to show up, aligned with the birther movement, racists, and all sorts of other accusatory names, while he is completely ignoring the union thugs who ARE bussed in, escorted into the meetings to reserved seats, who beat up normal people, who are coached to shout down protesters, and who are arrested.

Hey! Why not a special issue with multiple covers and he's on all of them?

Obama has been on the cover of Time magazine seven times since his election. Additionally, Michelle was given one of her own, making eight total in less than a year.

Bill Clinton was featured on the cover of Time seven times in his first year, plus one for Hillary.

If you add Reagan and both Bushes together, you get seven covers, plus one for Barbara Bush.

Sounds about right.

Who’s a good media lapdog? You are, yes you are.

Mainstream Media Bias, GDP edition

The networks barely mentioned it last year when the GDP doubled in the first quarter. Katie Couric, that bastion of objectivity, called the jump “disappointing.”

This year, the GDP dipped for the fourth straight quarter, the first time that has happened since they began keeping track in 1947, and the networks trumpet the news as a “glimmer of hope.”

What is different from last year at this time to now?

Oh, yeah. They weren’t Bush’s media lap puppies.

He wants to be on prime time AGAIN? Geez, what did we get ourselves into when we lied for him all of last year?

When Obama wants to go out there and have yet another prime time TV special devoted to his agenda, the only way he can get the airtime now seems to be if Rahm goes and does some arm-twisting on the bosses of the parent companies of the networks.

How sad is it (and utterly ironic) that the media is now grousing about having to be lap dogs for Obama?

It's less a revolving door and more like rewards. Sort of like doggie treats.

How long will it be before the number of mainstream journalists in the Obama administration outnumbers the number of mainstream media lapdogs still covering the administration?

Politician as a villain? Funny, if they are conservative. Hateful, if they are leftie. Racial, if it's Obama.

Exactly why is it “dangerous” and “mean-spirited” to have Obama’s face on a poster depicted in Joker face paint with the word “Socialism” underneath?

Was it also “dangerous” and “mean-spirited” to do the same thing to Bush?

Well? We’re waiting. Of course, we’ve been waiting for twelve months for you to condemn the Bush drawing. It only took hours for you to condemn the Obama poster.

Let's not forget that the same rag that tries to make the Obama picture a racial issue published a cover drawing of Bush as a vampire. Let's also not forget that the person who produced the Bush drawing was the same guy who did the famous Obama "hope" drawing.

Let's also not forget all the other times conservatives have been shown as monsters, vampires, etc. - all by the exact same people who are coming completely unglued now about the Obama Joker poster.

Who’s a good media lapdog?

Break Out The Tears

Susan Roesgen is out at CNN.

Who, you ask? You’re right, she’s not exactly a household name. You should remember her as the goober who went out during the Tea Party protests and attacked the people, defended poor ole Obama, and sneered about Fox News, effectively abandoning any pretense of objective journalism. She was a puppy in the media lapdog pack.

Good Riddance. Maybe she will land a job in the administration. Or a McDonald’s.

Oooh, A Stray From The Pack

Media Lapdog AP has a rogue writer they will need to rein in. He writes that Obama has already broken his pledge to not raise taxes on anyone but the rich and will likely have to do so again.

AP, you are going to lose all kinds of privileges if you don’t shut that guy up.

The Headline Could Have Been: Russians Thrilled By Obama, Until They See Him In Person

While media lapdog ABC proclaimed Russian youngsters were thrilled by Obama, and highlighted several who were excited by “yes we can,” even Reuters had to admit that both the media and students at his speech were less than thrilled, giving Obama a “lukewarm” reception and polite applause.

Mainstream Media Bias Alert, Covering Dead Troops Edition

The media lapdogs barely mention troops killed in Afghanistan, with good old Michael Jackson getting 20 to 60 times the coverage. On CNN, Anderson Cooper even gave 3 times more coverage to the Wife Carrying World Championship in Finland.

You know, it’s bad form to highlight troop deaths now that Big O is in office.

Who’s a good media lapdog? You are. Yes you are.

As Long As The Important People Are Taken Care Of

David Bauder of AP says that the lapdog media fawning over Obama is a mutually beneficial relationship.

Okay, so I guess it’s okay as long as it benefits Obama and the media. Who cares about truth…or the people…or their right to facts. As long as lefties and their lapdogs get what they want, right?